Retrospective study on the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Given the lack of information on safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients, we aimed to review our experience after surveying patients, as part of routine clinical practice, to ensure that advice on safety is accurate. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of MG patients from the Prosserman Family Neuromuscular Clinic at the Toronto General Hospital who received two injections of any COVID-19 vaccine from February to August 2021. Demographic data were abstracted from the patient medical records. We assessed changes in the severity of MG using the virtual Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (vMGII), the simple single question (SSQ), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). We also assessed adverse effects after vaccination. RESULTS: We included 200 patients with a mean age of 64.3 ± 13.9 y, 51.5% were men, and 82% had generalized MG. The vMGII, SSQ, and PASS scores remained stable after each vaccine dose, and at last follow-up. Of the patients, 60% reported an adverse reaction after the first injection, and 56% after the second. The most common adverse reactions reported were local pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and fever. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 vaccinations were well tolerated in MG patients and were not associated with worsening severity of their MG. The prevalence of vaccine-related adverse reactions was the same as in the general population.

Telephone consultation for myasthenia gravis care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessment of a novel virtual myasthenia gravis index.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine the association between the virtual Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (vMGII) with other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of myasthenia gravis (MG) and its usefulness in telephone consultations with MG patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series in which vMGII score along with virtual Single Simple Question (vSSQ), virtual Patient-Acceptable Symptom State PASS (vPASS) response, and patient disease status based on Myathenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status were collected during telephone consultation along with the MGII, SSQ, and PASS responses during the preceding in-person clinic visits. RESULTS: In 214 patients, the mean difference of vMGII between the vPASS "Yes" and "No" groups was -14.2 ± 1.4 (95% confidence interval, -16.9 to -11.3; P < .001) with mean vMGII for vPASS "Yes" group being 6.4 ± 7.7 and vPASS "No" being 20.5 ± 11.5. A vMGII of 11.5 or higher predicted vPASS "yes" response with a sensitivity of 78.7% and specificity of 81.4%. A strong negative correlation was found between the vMGII and vSSQ (r = -.667; P < .001). The mean vMGII was 0.48 ± 1.42 for patients in remission, and 9.31 ± 10.93 for improved, 9.32 ± 8.79 for stable, and 22.58 ± 14.04 for worsened groups (P < .001). These associations were the same as those obtained during the preceding in-person clinic visit and the direction of change in MGII scores also indicated change in disease status. DISCUSSION: vMGII is an effective measure to assess an MG patient's disease status in telephone consultations and relates well with other PRO measures. The vMGII remains reliable for assessing MG disease status even with removal of the physical examination component.